Pope Francis Pastoring Protestors

Pope Francis Pastoring Protestors

The fourth meeting of โ€œPopular Movements โ€œwas held in October, 2021 and sponsored by โ€œPeople Improving Communities through Organizingโ€ (PICO), the Vatican, and the โ€œCatholic Campaign for Human Development,โ€ an organ of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). Two of the three represent the Catholic hierarchy, and the third was created by a Catholic priest. All three sponsoring organizations embrace left-wing political thinking!

Before turning to Pope Francisโ€™ keynote address at the meeting, an explanation of PICO is in order.

The organization was founded by a Jesuit priest, John Bowman, a community activist who together with Tom Gaudette and Scott Reed shaped the organization according to the principles and strategies of Saul Alinsky, the author of Rules for Radicals, which he dedicated to Lucifer (aka Satan). His stated goal was to โ€œcreate a Socialist State,โ€ and his strategies included these:

Gaining control of the healthcare system; increasing the poverty level to make the poor rebellious; increasing the debt and taxes; enacting gun control; using welfare to take away peopleโ€™s self-defense; controlling what people read and listen to; undermining belief in God; and stoking discontentment by dividing people into wealthy and poor. [The realization that these strategies have already succeeded  is unnerving.]

The Alinsky influence helps explain this statement by his devotee Scott Reed several years ago: โ€œAll of us have been profoundly affected by Black Lives Matter, the immigrant rights movement, certainly the #MeToo movement . . . We are fighting the criminalization of people of colorโ€”working to reduce gun violence and mass incarceration in our communities. That work is relationally connected to Black Lives Matter. Because of some of our faith commitments and connections, we had a lot of folks in Ferguson that began to connect us to police brutality.โ€

Now letโ€™s turn to Pope Francisโ€ keynote address, which offered not criticism but praise and encouragement to the activists. After thanking them for opposing โ€œthe culture of privilege,โ€ he condemned the โ€œculture of indifferenceโ€ displayed by โ€œbig mediaโ€ and โ€œopinion makersโ€ and praised the activists for โ€œconfront[ing] together the populist discourses of intolerance, xenophobia [and]. . . hatred of the poor.โ€

Francis then noted that when he thinks of the Good Samaritan, he is reminded of the murder of George Floyd, and he thinks (with obvious fondness) of those who gathered in protestโ€”he calls them the โ€œCollective Samaritans.โ€

Francis went on to urge a number of actions. One was โ€œhumane distributionโ€ of wealth, adding that โ€œit is up to governments to establish tax and redistribution schemes . . . .โ€ Another was to provide โ€œa basic incomeor salary to everyone in the world,โ€ and to shorten the workday . . . so that more people can have access to the labour market.โ€ Others included having โ€œpharmaceutical companies release their patents,โ€ having financial groups cancel the debts of the poor; having โ€œmining, oil, forestry, real estate, agribusiness [companies] stop destroying forests, wetlands and mountains, stop polluting rivers and seas, [and] stop poisoning food and peopleโ€; having โ€œthe great food corporations stop imposing monopolistic systems of production and distribution that inflate prices . . .โ€; having โ€œtechnology giants stop exploiting human weakness [and] peopleโ€™s vulnerability, for the sake of profits without caring about the spread of hate speech, . . . fake newsconspiracy theories, and political manipulationโ€; and having โ€œpowerful countries stop aggression, blockades and unilateral sanctions against any country anywhere on earth. No to neo-colonialism.โ€

I have added bold type to certain words in the three previous paragraphs so that readers can more easily reference them as I discuss their genesis and import.

The following terms of Francis were likely borrowed from left-wing media attacks on conservatives in general and Donald Trump in particular:  โ€œintolerance,โ€ โ€xenophobia,โ€ โ€hate speech,โ€ โ€œfake news,โ€ โ€œconspiracy theoriesโ€ โ€œunilateral sanctions,โ€ and โ€œneo-colonialism.โ€

These words seem directly out of the Climate Change playbook: โ€œdestroying,โ€ โ€œpolluting,โ€ and โ€œpoisoning.โ€

These words, and the concepts they denote, are almost pure socialist-talk: โ€œculture of privilege,โ€ โ€œgovernments . . . establish tax and redistribution,โ€ โ€œimposing monopolistic systems,โ€ โ€œexploiting human weakness.โ€

Francisโ€™ term โ€œCollective Samaritansโ€ he may have invented. It differs from the other phrases that it weds a communist term with a Gospel name. (Whether this is symbolic of a pattern of thought Francis finds appealing is not clear.)

Francisโ€™ phrase โ€œconfront[ing] . . . populist discoursesโ€ is perhaps the most revealing of all the terms he chose. The use of the word โ€œpopulistโ€ here has a negative connotation; otherwise, he wouldnโ€™t praise activists for confronting it. Yet historically the word had a positive connotation; dictionaries still define it as โ€œsupportive of the rights and power of the people,โ€ a decidedly favorable condition, at least in a democracy. If memory serves, it was only when Donald Trump advanced populist policies that the term lost favorable status. Whether Pope Francis is showing his animosity toward Trump or his linguistic borrowing from left-leaning media (or both) I cannot say.

Francisโ€™ statements about providing a โ€œbasic income or salary to everyoneโ€ and โ€œshorten[ing] the workweek . . .  so that more people can have access to the labour marketโ€are, to be charitable, ill-considered. Receiving income without working creates a sense of entitlement that can lead to disinclination to working and increased dependency on others, and the Gospel warns against that. (See 2 Thessalonians 3:10) And shortening the workweek is unlikely to create access to todayโ€™s labor market, which is increasingly skill-based. Unemployed workers who lack the requisite skills will hardly be able to fill skilled positions!

As I have shown, Pope Francis regards protesters as his sheep and he pastors them with compassion and love. That response can be virtuous, but only if the context in which it occurs is based on reality. In this case, Pope Francisโ€™ pastoring is not. Far from it, and here is why:

The protest movements Francis praises, and USCCB and PICO sponsor, may be well-intentioned and partly laudable, but in the main they are rooted in an evil philosophy (Socialism) and pursued with strategies designed to pleaseโ€”not Jesusโ€”but instead Alinskyโ€™s mentor Lucifer, while causing suffering and hatred for humankind.

Francis is shamefully blind to the harm that has been done around the world by left-wing activismโ€”replacing reason with blind rage, burning buildings, looting stores, destroying monuments built to honor noble men and women, undermining law and order, installing governments more corrupt than the ones they replace, assaulting/raping/murdering innocent people, stoking fear, resentment, and hate, and sowing contempt for morality and religious devotion. 

I say โ€œshamefullyโ€ because it is inconceivable that he does not know better. After all, he lived most of his life in a country that experienced all these evils, and has seen them repeated in other countries and on other continents ever since. To be more specific, he has seen them threatening the very survival of the country most dedicated to Judeo-Christian values, the United States. And yet he does not condemn but instead praises the very forces that seek to destroy this country and its values.

Nor is he alone in this shameful posture. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the largely Catholic activists of PICO share it.

Older Catholics like this author will remember the time when we respected the hierarchy, and not just because it was the polite thing to do, but because they earned and therefore deserved respect. We looked to them for insight and wisdom and were seldom disappointed. We had a sense that not only was the Holy Spirit guiding them, but that they were attuned to His message. Today, the evidence is mounting that they are no longer attuned, and the Church and the world are much the worse for it.

Copyright ยฉ 2021 by Vincent Ryan Ruggiero. All rights reserved

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Written by
Vincent Ryan Ruggiero